Kinh Nghiệm Hướng dẫn How did the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen impact the French Revolution? Chi Tiết
You đang tìm kiếm từ khóa How did the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen impact the French Revolution? được Update vào lúc : 2022-09-18 19:35:04 . Với phương châm chia sẻ Bí quyết Hướng dẫn trong nội dung bài viết một cách Chi Tiết 2022. Nếu sau khi Read nội dung bài viết vẫn ko hiểu thì hoàn toàn có thể lại phản hồi ở cuối bài để Ad lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha.
2.5 Declaration of the Rights of Man
On 26 August 1789, the Assembly passed the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen as the preamble to a constitution drawn up in 1791. (The Declaration also prefaced the later constitutions of 1793 and 1795.)
Nội dung chính
- 2.5 Declaration of the Rights of ManBasic characterEffects of the declarationThose left out of the DeclarationEffect todayText of the DeclarationCompare to other bills of rightsReferencesISBN links tư vấn NWE through referral feesWhy was the Declaration of rights of Man so important during French Revolution?What impact did the French Declaration of the Rights of Man have?How did the Declaration of Independence influence the French Revolution?Did the Declaration of the Rights of Man start the French Revolution?
Click to view Declaration of the Rights of Man and
Citizen [Tip: hold Ctrl and click a link to open it in a new tab. (Hide tip)] .
Exercise 3
Now read this document (above). How far do you see in it the influence of the Enlightenment? What was revolutionary about it?
Discussion
The principles contained in the Declaration and described there as ‘simple and incontrovertible’ were familiar to the deputies from the Encyclopédie (and also from the American Revolution). They derived from the Enlightenment and were invoked in the petitions (cahiers de doléances), the lists of grievances which the delegates had drawn up for the meeting of the Estates-General. What made them revolutionary was that for the first
time in European history they were formally incorporated and proclaimed in a document of state, which declared that the ‘purpose of all political institutions’ was to guarantee the citizens’ ‘natural rights’ (civil rights or human rights, as we call them now). These rights were declared to be inalienable: that is, citizens could not divest themselves of them (for example, by selling them) or be deprived of them by subsequent legislation. They were to be entrenched in the constitution.
Article 1 reaffirmed the principle of equality: ‘Men are born and remain không lấy phí and equal in … rights; social distinctions can only be based on public utility’ (as opposed to noble birth or status). The rights of man included freedom from arbitrary arrest and imprisonment, freedom of opinion and speech, the right to a voice in the levying of taxes, the right to own property, equality before the law, and (as we have seen) equality of opportunity in access to government posts.
There
was one crucial limitation: the rights of man did not apply to women. The (male) revolutionaries were largely hostile to the cause of women’s suffrage, though women took part in some of the events of the Revolution and their cause was championed by such distinguished writers as Condorcet (1743–94), one of the younger philosophes of the Enlightenment. In 1793 women were to be expressly excluded from the rights of citizens. The feminist Olympe de Gouges, author of The Declaration of the
Rights of Woman and Citizen (1791), was to fall victim to the Terror in 1793.
Also revolutionary in the European context was the assertion in the Declaration that sovereignty resided with the nation, not with the king (a claim made in the Encyclopédie, as we have seen, and vindicated in the American Revolution). In October 1789, absolute monarchy was formally abolished and replaced by constitutional monarchy. The Assembly decreed that Louis XVI was ‘by the grace of God and
the constitutional law of the State, King of the French’ (emphasis added).
Click to view The Decree on the abolition of nobility.
Exercise 4
Now read the decree on the abolition of nobility (above), June 1790 . Do you notice any similarity with What is the Third Estate? by Sieyès?
Discussion
The decree implements precisely what Sieyès and his fellow deputies of the Third Estate demanded: the outright abolition of the nobility as a separate social order. Henceforth everyone is simply a ‘French citizen’ without distinction of titles or armorial insignia. In tone the decree echoes Sieyes’s uncompromising egalitarian hostility towards noble privilege.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (French: La Déclaration des droits de l’Homme et du citoyen) is one of the fundamental documents of the French Revolution. Influenced by the doctrine of natural rights, it promulgates a set of individual rights and
collective rights which are defined as universal: they are supposed to be valid in all times and places, pertaining to human nature itself. The last article of the Declaration was adopted August 26, 1789,[1] by the National Constituent Assembly (Assemblée nationale constituante) as the first step toward writing a constitution.
Along with the U.S. Declaration of Independence, it is considered to be a major precursor to international human rights instruments.
While it set forth fundamental rights for all men without exception, the Declaration of the Rights of Man did not make any statement about the status of women, nor did it explicitly address
slavery. Also, although the declaration avowed that it was created “under the auspices of the Supreme Being,” it holds back from the affirmation of its US counterpart, which proclaims that human rights are endowed by God, rather than the state.
Contents
- 1 Basic character2 Effects of the declaration3 Those left out of the Declaration4 Effect today5 Text of the Declaration
- 5.1 Compare to other bills of rights
6 See also7 Notes8
References9 Credits
The principles set forth in the declaration are of constitutional value in present-day French law and may be used to oppose legislation or other government activities.
Basic character
“
First Article – Men are born and remain không lấy phí and equal in rights. Social distinctions can be founded only on the common utility.
”
The Declaration of the Rights of Man was intended as part of a transition from an absolute to a constitutional monarchy. Among its drafters was the
Marquis de Lafayette. Many of the principles laid down in the declaration directly oppose the institutions and usages of the ancien régime of pre-revolutionary France. France soon became a
republic, but this document remained fundamental.
The rights set forth in the declaration come from the philosophical and political principles of the Age of Enlightenment, such as individualism, the
social contract as theorized by Thomas Hobbes of England and adopted to the French by Jean Jacques Rousseau, and the separation of powers espoused by the
baron de Montesquieu. As can be seen by comparing the texts, the French declaration is heavily influenced by the concept of human rights contained in the U.S. Declaration of Independence (July 4, 1776) of which the delegates were fully aware.[2] Moreover, the declaration was checked by Thomas Jefferson, the author of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, then the U.S. ambassador in Paris, before its acceptance. Lafayette and some other main actors of the French
Revolution had already fought in the U.S. War of Independence.
A major difference in the two documents is that the French declaration makes no mention of God as the source of human rights, while the U.S. declaration affirms that human rights are derived from the “Creator” and that the role of the government is to protect these God-given rights.
Effects of the declaration
This statement of principles contained in the declaration
provided the kernel of a much more radical re-ordering of society than had yet taken place.
“
(From Article VI) – All the citizens, being equal in [the eyes of the law], are equally admissible to all public dignities, places, and employments, according to their capacity and without distinction other than that of their virtues and of their talents.
”
This commitment to equality strikingly contrasts with the pre-revolutionary division of French society in three estates—the clergy, the
aristocracy, and the common people (known as the Third Estate)—where the first two estates had special rights. Specifically, it contradicts the idea of people being born into noble or other special class, and enjoying (or being deprived of) certain rights for this reason.
The declaration provides that citizens are to be guaranteed the rights of “liberty, property, security, and
resistance to oppression.” It argues that the need for law derives from the fact that “…the exercise of the natural rights of each man has only those borders which assure other members of the society the enjoyment of these same rights.” Thus, the declaration sees law as an “expression of the general will,” intended to promote an equality of rights and to forbid “only actions harmful to
the society.”
A mere six weeks after the storming of the Bastille and barely three weeks after the abolition of feudalism, the declaration put forward a doctrine of popular sovereignty and equal opportunity:
“
(From Article III) – The principle of any sovereignty resides essentially in the Nation. No body toàn thân, no individual can exert authority which does not emanate expressly from it
”
This contrasts with the pre-revolutionary situation in France, where the political doctrine of the monarchy found the source of law in the divine right of kings.
The declaration also put forward several provisions similar to those in the
United States Constitution (1787) and the United States Bill of Rights (1789). Like the U.S. Constitution, it discusses the need to provide for the common defense and states some broad principles of taxation which overturned
the tax standards of the pre-revolutionary era, in which the Church and the nobility were exempted from most taxes. It also specifies a public right to an accounting from public agents as to how they have discharged the public trust.
The declaration also prohibits ex post facto application of criminal law and proclaims the presumption of innocence,
prohibiting undue duress to the suspect. In pre-revolutionary France, while technically one was considered guilty only after having been sentenced by the appropriate authorities, the royal courts made ample use of torture to extract confessions and gave few rights to the defense. In most cases, it was very likely that one would be convicted and sentenced, once suspected.
The declaration also
provides for freedom of speech and of the press, but a relatively weak guarantee of freedom of religion—”provided that […the]
manifestation [of religious opinions] does not trouble the public order established by the law.” It asserts the rights of property, while reserving a public right of eminent domain:
“
“(From Article XVII) – Property being an inviolable and sacred right, no one can be deprived of private usage, if it is not when the public necessity, legally noted, evidently requires it, and under the condition of a just and prior indemnity [that is, compensation].
”
The declaration is largely addressed to the rights of individuals, not addressing freedom of assembly, freedom of association, or the right to strike. However, these principles did eventually acquire a constitutional value, from the provisions of the Constitution of the French Fourth Republic, under which, unlike the time of the Revolution,
these were specifically understood to extend to women and blacks.
Those left out of the Declaration
The declaration, as originally understood, recognized most rights as only belonging to males and did not give rights to women or abolish slavery. It has also been criticized for its weakness—compared to the U.S. Bill of Rights—with
regard to freedom of religion and association.
Sometime after The March on Versailles on October 5, 1789, the women of France presented the Women’s Petition to the National Assembly in which they proposed a decree giving women equality. The Declaration’s failure to include women was also objected to by Olympe de Gouges in her 1791 Declaration of the Rights of Woman and the Female Citizen. Women were finally given these rights with the adoption of the 1946 Constitution of the French Fourth
Republic.
Similarly, despite the lack of explicit mention of slavery in the Declaration, the slave revolt on Saint-Domingue that became the Haitian Revolution took inspiration from its words, as discussed in C.L.R. James’ history of the Haitian Revolution, The Black Jacobins.
On the other hand, the declaration’s adversarial attitude toward the Roman Catholic Church as the Second Estate resulted in a permanent traditional of secularism, sometimes taking the extreme form of
persecution both of the formerly established Church and religious minorities deemed by the state to conflict with “public order.”
Effect today
According to the preamble of the Constitution of the French Fifth Republic (adopted on October 4, 1958, and the current constitution as of 2005), the principles set forth in the Declaration of the Rights of Man have constitutional value. Many laws and regulations enacted by the state have been overturned
because they did not comply with those principles as interpreted by the Constitutional Council of France or the Conseil d’État (“Council of State”).
Many of the principles in the 1789 declaration have far-reaching implications nowadays:
- Taxation legislation or practices that seem to make some unwarranted difference between citizens are struck down as unconstitutional.Suggestions of positive discrimination on ethnic grounds are rejected because they infringe on
the principle of equality, since they would establish categories of people that would, by birth, enjoy greater rights.Laws deemed discriminatory toward religions have also been struck down, although France’s record on this score remains a subject of international criticism.[3]
The declaration has also influenced
and inspired rights-based liberal democracy throughout the world.
Text of the Declaration
The representatives of the French people, organized as a National Assembly, believing that the ignorance, neglect, or contempt of the rights of man are the sole cause of public calamities and of the corruption of governments, have determined to set forth in a solemn declaration the natural, unalienable, and sacred rights of man, in order that this
declaration, being constantly before all the members of the Social body toàn thân, shall remind them continually of their rights and duties; in order that the acts of the legislative power, as well as those of the executive power, may be compared any moment with the objects and purposes of all political institutions and may thus be more respected, and, lastly, in order that the grievances of the citizens, based hereafter upon simple and incontestable principles, shall tend to the maintenance of the
constitution and redound to the happiness of all. Therefore the National Assembly recognizes and proclaims, in the presence and under the auspices of the Supreme Being, the following rights of man and of the citizen:
Articles:
1. Men are born and remain không lấy phí and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good.
2. The aim of all political association is the preservation of the natural and imprescriptible rights of man. These rights are
liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.
3. The principle of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation. No body toàn thân nor individual may exercise any authority which does not proceed directly from the nation.
4. Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights. These limits
can only be determined by law.
5. Law can only prohibit such actions as are hurtful to society. Nothing may be prevented which is not forbidden by law, and no one may be forced to do anything not provided for by law.
6. Law is the expression of the general will. Every citizen has a right to participate personally, or through his representative, in its foundation. It must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal in the eyes of the law, are
equally eligible to all dignities and to all public positions and occupations, according to their abilities, and without distinction except that of their virtues and talents.
7. No person shall be accused, arrested, or imprisoned except in the cases and according to the forms prescribed by law. Any one soliciting, transmitting, executing, or causing to be executed, any arbitrary order, shall be punished. But any citizen summoned or arrested in virtue of the law shall submit without delay,
as resistance constitutes an offense.
8. The law shall provide for such punishments only as are strictly and obviously necessary, and no one shall suffer punishment except it be legally inflicted in virtue of a law passed and promulgated before the commission of the offense.
9. As all persons are held innocent until they shall have been declared guilty, if arrest shall be deemed indispensable, all harshness not essential to the securing of the prisoner’s person shall be severely
repressed by law.
10. No one shall be disquieted on account of his opinions, including his religious views, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law.
11. The không lấy phí communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Every citizen may, accordingly, speak, write, and print with freedom, but shall be responsible for such abuses of this freedom as shall be defined by law.
12. The security of the rights of
man and of the citizen requires public military forces. These forces are, therefore, established for the good of all and not for the personal advantage of those to whom they shall be entrusted.
13. A common contribution is essential for the maintenance of the public forces and for the cost of administration. This should be equitably distributed among all the citizens in proportion to their means.
14. All the citizens have a right to decide, either personally or by their
representatives, as to the necessity of the public contribution; to grant this freely; to know to what uses it is put; and to fix the proportion, the mode of assessment and of collection and the duration of the taxes.
15. Society has the right to require of every public agent an account of his administration.
16. A society in which the observance of the law is not assured, nor the separation of powers defined, has no constitution all.
17. Since property is an inviolable
and sacred right, no one shall be deprived thereof except where public necessity, legally determined, shall clearly demand it, and then only on condition that the owner shall have been previously and equitably indemnified.
Compare to other bills of rights
- England: The Bill of Rights of 1689, on which the U.S. Bill of Rights was partly based.Scotland: The Claim of Right, similar in chronology and
origin to the English Bill.United States: the United States Bill of Rights (1789)United Nations: Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)Europe:
European Convention on Human Rights (1950), Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000)Canada: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982).
See also
- Moral universalismPolitics of FranceNatural law and natural rightsUniversality (these rights are universal, i.e. valid in all times and places, or claim to be)
Notes
↑ Some sources say August 27
because the debate was not officially closed.↑ The American Declaration was in part based on the Virginia Declaration of Rights developed by George Mason in June 1776, themselves based on the 1689 English
Bill of Rights, published a full century before the French version. Few French were vividly aware of these precedents.↑ Index of Anti-Cult Laws and Laïcité in France Center for Studies on New Religions, Torino, Italy Retrieved April 30,
2008.
ReferencesISBN links tư vấn NWE through referral fees
- Church, William Farr. The Influence of the Enlightenment on the French Revolution. Problems in European civilization. Lexington, Mass: D.C. Heath, 1973.
ISBN 978-0669820249Collins, Irene. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen 1789 and 1793. Liverpool: Department of History, University of Liverpool, 1985.
ISBN 978-0947608057Dunn, Susan. Sister Revolutions: French Lightning, American Light. Tp New York: Faber and Faber, 1999.
ISBN 978-0571199006Grayling, A. C. Toward the Light of Liberty: The Struggles for Freedom and Rights That Made the Modern Western World. Tp New York: Walker & Co, 2007.
ISBN 978-0802716361Jellinek, Georg. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of Citizens: A Contribution to Modern Constitutional History. Westport, Conn: Hyperion Press, 1979.
ISBN 978-0883559345Steiner, Henry and Alston, Philip. International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals. Oxford University Press; 2nd edition, 2000.
ISBN 978-0198298496
cateogory:politics
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia
standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of
this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
- Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen history
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
- History of “Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen”
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
Why was the Declaration of rights of Man so important during French Revolution?
As its name suggests, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen was a written expression of the natural rights of citizens in revolutionary France. Inspired by British and American covenants, France’s declaration was the most ambitious attempt to protect individual rights in any European nation to that point.
What impact did the French Declaration of the Rights of Man have?
It became the basis for a nation of không lấy phí individuals protected equally by the law. It is included in the beginning of the constitutions of both the Fourth French Republic (1946) and Fifth Republic (1958) and is considered valid as constitutional law.
How did the Declaration of Independence influence the French Revolution?
The French who had direct contact with the Americans were able to successfully implement Enlightenment ideas into a new political system. The National Assembly in France even used the American Declaration of Independence as a model when drafting the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen in 1789.
Did the Declaration of the Rights of Man start the French Revolution?
Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, French Declaration des Droits de l’Homme et du Citoyen, one of the basic charters of human liberties, containing the principles that inspired the French Revolution.
Tải thêm tài liệu liên quan đến nội dung bài viết How did the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen impact the French Revolution?
Reply
5
0
Chia sẻ
Video How did the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen impact the French Revolution? ?
Bạn vừa Read Post Với Một số hướng dẫn một cách rõ ràng hơn về Video How did the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen impact the French Revolution? tiên tiến và phát triển nhất
Share Link Cập nhật How did the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen impact the French Revolution? miễn phí
Bạn đang tìm một số trong những Chia Sẻ Link Cập nhật How did the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen impact the French Revolution? Free.
Giải đáp vướng mắc về How did the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen impact the French Revolution?
Nếu Ban sau khi đọc nội dung bài viết How did the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen impact the French Revolution? , bạn vẫn chưa hiểu thì hoàn toàn có thể lại phản hồi ở cuối bài để Ad lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha
#Declaration #Rights #Man #Citizen #impact #French #Revolution